MSY objective

The EU adopted a Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) approach to fish stock management as part of the 2013 reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. But applying the MSY-strategy has proved to be a substantial challenge.


What is Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY)?
  • It is a harvest strategy widely adopted in global fisheries, including the EU Common Fisheries Policy. 
  • It should act as an interim step toward more robust ecosystem-based management.
  • It is a fisheries exploitation concept that seeks the largest long-term predictable catch possible from a stable, ‘equilibrium’ environment. 

Global use and interpretation of the MSY approach has evolved in complexity since the early 20th century and its implementation is still hotly debated. Scientists continue to challenge MSY as a valid management objective from economic, societal and biological perspectives.


Source: FAO


The EU adoption of MSY

The EU’s interpretation aligns with prior international commitments in 2002 and 2012 to achieve MSY by 2015, where possible, and by 2020 at the latest. It is reiterated in the UN’s 2015 Sustainable Development Goals

The EU interpretation is also more ambitious, seeking to restore and maintain populations of fish stocks “above biomass levels capable of producing MSY” (CFP Article 2.2) 

However, EU has introduced more flexibility in meeting this objective by introducing MSY-ranges for stocks managed under multi-annual management plans (MAPs). These ranges are provided in the scientific advice that informs the decision-making on fishing opportunities. In practice, this means that the decision-makers can decide to be less certain about stock recovery by choosing an option in the range that allows more fishing. This way overfishing may continue and there is a risk that the fish stock biomass may decline, instead of increase. The MSY-ranges were first introduced in the Baltic Sea Multi-annual plan (See Annex 1).


MSY and policy

MSY is a maximum value beyond which stock productivity is assumed to decline. Given the uncertainty in fisheries stock assessment, attempting to exploit a stock at a rate which can produce MSY (FMSY) can easily lead to overfishing the stock in terms of both growth and recruitment. 

Furthermore, maximising yield as a policy excludes the market impact on various fleet sectors, frequently creating an unprofitable fishery characterised by a technological race to catch more of a decreasing stock and the prioritization of larger scale industry over more diverse community-based fisheries. The value of the CFP’s objective to fish below FMSY in Article 2.2 is the potential to prevent this race to the last fish. 

The current challenge for policy makers is to determine an appropriate exploitation rate below FMSY to establish equitable and profitable fisheries and to refrain from using the loophole for overfishing that was introduced through the MSY-ranges with the regional management plans.



Last updated: February 10, 2021

Recent publications

Joint NGO recommendations Northeast Atlantic fishing opportunities 202...

October 14, 2021

NGO signatories of this document wish to present our recommendations on the setting of fishing opportunities for north east Atlantic...

Updated FINAL NGO recommendations Baltic TACs 2022 based on ICES advi...

October 8, 2021

When our first Joint NGO recommendations Baltic TACs 2022 was released International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)...

Common Fisheries Policy: Mission not yet accomplished

June 11, 2021

Seven years after the last reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) entered into force, the EU, which has exclusive...

It’s there for a reason: Why Ministers must not exceed scientific advi...

November 25, 2019

In a briefing by Griffin Carpenter of the New Economics Foundation the reasons and benefits for Ministers not exceeding scientific...